It looks like Renee Pittman Mitchell has stopped taking her medication again...
She sent me a link to a page on her website where she's complaining that my blog gets higher ratings in google than her rants do. Boo hoo, Renee.
Here's the link, in case you want to see what a raving lunatic she really is (and give her website a few bumps up the rating scale to make her feel better)...
She attempts to turn this issue into a bigger one by making ridiculous accusations against me and others, hoping I'll defend myself when really I have no need to worry about false claims made by a deranged person who can't tell the difference between reality and her imagination. The material I publish speaks for itself.
I'll just point out a few things I spotted...
Even though she says I went on the attack the day after the FSU shooting, the fact is, I didn't even hear about it until about a week later because I hadn't been online during that whole time and it was Dee Dorsty who first brought it to my attention. I'm sure that if I was online at all during that time, it could be proven. But it can't because I know I wasn't. Anyone can check my facebook account or google my name to look for any posts made by me during that time. They won't find any.
But thanks for the laugh... and the extra publicity for my blog...
I hope she gets the help she needs real soon. Her website rants clearly indicates that she needs some. Delusional, fantasy-prone, paranoid, irresponsible, accusatory, temperamental, weak-minded, emotionally reactive, self-absorbed, obsessive, etc. are NOT good qualities to have if you wish to portray yourself as a real TI who wants to be taken seriously. You are not one, Renee. You are exactly the sort of person the perps like to keep active in the TI community, because you dissuade non-TIs from believing that there really are targeting programs.
Luckily for real TIs, Renee's audience is apparently growing smaller as people come to realize what she really is...
And according to Renee, it's my fault. Well, I'll accept that as a compliment. The truth always wins out, and that's why I stick to it.
Renee's webpage appears to be adding more details to the Myron May story, but it's too late because het lying and uncooperativeness has already disqualified her as a reliable source of information, so all that extra BS she's recently added to it isn't even worth considering at this point. Perhaps if she had made the evidence available when asked for, she could have been exonerated, but not now... She's STILL trying to profit off of Myron May's death.
Let me just point out Renee's own hypocracy...
In this most recent rant, she states that someone named Darlene Mile "should be thinking
about recanting an outrageous lie, malicious implication, or at the very least proving it factual and revealing your source."
Well, Renee hasn't been at all forthcoming when asked for evidence to prove her story is true, even though she claims to have it in her possession and it would certainly help to prove her claims, but she has refused to be cooperative in every way. Instead, she chooses to kick up a storm of anger that anyone would choose not to believe her without question. Oh well... sissy fits don't work on most adults, Renee.
Look at this quote from her recent rant:
"With the passwords to May yahoo email, I also learned that May had been in contact
with Derrick Robinson as early as November 3, 2014, after opening up his emails, with
May again emailing him asking why he had not contacted him regarding his hope to
provide legal assistance to the Targeted Individual community on or about November
14, 2015 after no response back. Derrick’s response was that he had contacted May
and did not understand why May had not gotten his message."
How about she posts the emails written by Myron May from his account that she illegally accessed after his death and even admits to doing? SHOW US THE EVIDENCE, RENEE!!!
I stopped reading her raving diatribe at this point. It just goes on and on and on.........
Is Renee Bitchin' Mitchell a goverment-paid shill? I believe she's either that, or she's so predictably reactive that her handlers can play her like a puppet without her even realizing it. (And YES, that's a direct allegation, Renee. Watcha gonna do 'bout it? Want to take this into a public courtroom? I do...)
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Friday, November 28, 2014
I'm currently investigating all the information I can find re the FSU shooting and I'll be posting my findings sometime in the future. I'd just like to say at this early point that in spite of what others might think, there's good reason to question the possibility that this was a hoax (staged event), just as much as there's reason to question whether it was inspired by actual targeting or by a wild imagination or even mental illness. Under the circumstances TIs are in, with the type of psychological manipulation that's going on, it isn't wise to immediately accept anything that's said about this incident (or anything else), especially without some good evidence to back it up. It's important not to draw any conclusions too quickly, and to give all possibilities a fair consideration based on all of the available evidence.
So far, I can list a few reported pieces of information that suggest this might have been a staged event:
1) The library where the shooting occurred was reported by CNN to have 300 to 400 students in it at 12:30 at night on a weeknight. What were so many students doing at the library at that hour? On the other hand, the later the hour, the fewer witnesses to an active shooter drill.
2) Out of all those hundreds of people, only 3 were shot, and none were killed. The less 'victims' involved, the less possibility of a staged event being exposed.
3) According to police, the first 911 call received was from one of the three victims. Several more calls were received after that. Several, not dozens.
4) So far, I have yet to see more than one interview with any of these hundreds of people present, or anything else that would verify the claim of 300 to 400 people in the library at the time. Nothing was said about this in that one interview, which was more focused on a bullet that got lodged in a student's backpack.
5) Also, there was an apparent absence of security cameras in the university library, since nothing has been mentioned about any possible footage.
6) Four days before the shooting, FOX News reported on an unannounced active shooter drill at a middle school somewhere in Florida that had angered parents because students had thought it was real.
7) None of the usual information about the weapon used, the number of shots fired, etc., appears to have been highlighted, as in past shootings. Nor are there any photos or videos available that would clarify anything. The sort of evidence that's usually made big fanfare of in the news is completely lacking in this case. Past active shooter drills that have been turned into news events have shown that the less information the public is given, the better.
So, apart from what CNN and a few other MSM news sources reported (dictated to them by the authorities), there's nothing to show that there were so many people present, and everything to suggest that it was the perfect setting for a staged 'drill', similar in many ways to what took place at Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon but on a much smaller scale and less sophisticated. I'm not saying (yet) that this was definitely a staged event, but the possibility is definitely there.
My own feelings about this incident lean towards the possibility that the original story put out by the MSM was hijacked by certain others in the TI community, just as was done with the Aaron Alexis story soon after it broke. More specifically, I believe that the packages that were mentioned in the MSM had nothing to do with Derrick Robinson at all, that he made that part up, that the alleged suicide letter that was released online was faked, and that Renee Pittman's part in this is questionable as well, beyond the fact that she was apparently in touch with May and was allegedly sent a package from him. The important thing to ask is, who says so, and how do we know they're telling the truth? So far, it appears to me that Pittman herself is the original source for this claim about her involvement. From what I understand, she contacted the MSM and made the claim, which got her mentioned in the news as being one of the package recipients. Also, the only source I can find that ties Derrick Robinson to the packages is himself. (If anyone can correct me on any of this, please do so.) If the suicide letter was actually released by the authorities, which I don't think they did, you would expect that a more reputable news source than Memory Hole would have published it.
Further, the whole idea that Myron May was acting out a pre-planned attack is very doubtful when you consider what actually took place. The incident was over almost before it even started, and resulted in a very minor news event. It was nothing of any proportion that he could have even hoped would get any message out. On the other hand, TIs will only be hurt by the connection of the shooting to targeting, since to mainstream society it only reflects the potential instability of TIs in general, rather than the cause of the problem. The packages were not sent to news outlets or government bodies, but to people May "knew and trusted", according to the suicide letter. Not a very effective plan.
If I were planning a suicide attack to get the message out about targeting, I certainly wouldn't have chosen a location filled with obviously innocent people and not likely to be heavily populated. Nor would I fail to make the event as attention-grabbing and newsworthy as possible by only taking one handgun with me and only getting off three hits before I stood off with the police and let them take me out so quickly and easily. There appears to have been no real pre-planning or any specifically chosen targets, in spite of the fact that the alleged suicide note clearly indicated that he had planned out what he was going to do. The expectation that his personal story about being targeted was going to wake people up was simply ridiculous, considering how many TI stories are already out there that nobody pays much attention to. Considering the letter from the point of view that it was by all appearances directed more to the TI community than anyone else, it was completely pointless, other than to release it after the fact as a ruse to encourage TIs to do exactly what FFCHS encourages them to do, and which has proven to be a total waste of time and even damaging to the TI community. A far more effective action would have been to send the packages to as many news outlets, government bodies, and organizations as possible, rather than to leave it to a few people to take up the responsibility that was put on them to publish his story and get people to petition the government. It would have also been more believable if he had posted the material in the package online prior to the shooting, including some personal information that would prove it was from him, and then set up links to it immediately before the attack, so that when people googled his name, they would find it. The only reason not to do this would have been the foresight that the authorities would immediately take it down, in which case it would have been obvious that the material in the packages would have been suppressed anyway (as it apparently has been), so what would be the point at all? To bring unwanted problems on those people he sent the packages to?
Remember, May was an intelligent person, a felony prosecutor who understood some things about the law and how authorities conduct investigations, so he would have foreseen these problems. But someone who was hijacking the story to promote their own agenda wouldn't have had time to properly think through the scenario they were creating in the short time they had, and would have made those sorts of errors. Plus, their agenda would be reflected in the alleged suicide letter if they had faked it, which is what we find with the letter published at the Memory Hole. The Memory Hole, by the way, gives FFCHS and their affiliates a lot of positive publicity. Also, James F. Tracy, who published the letter, is eager to push the idea that May is being regarded by the media and authorities as mentally ill, but the only allusion to mental illness that I can find so far comes from 'news' outlets like his own and nowhere else.
More to come...
Thursday, September 11, 2014
There's a group of people on facebook that I've had my own bad experiences with and keep hearing others claiming the same sort of things about, again and again. I have yet to hear anything positive said about this group in the three years that I've been aware of them. That alone says something about their purported reason for existing. They operate just like gang-stalkers in that they're a gang and they stalk people in the TI community who say things they don't like. Usually it's things said about themselves, even though this is no excuse to start posting announcements in public that are only intended to discredit the person without providing any hard evidence, nor is it generally a good idea to talk trash about people in private forums. It's far better to be mature and deal with the issues directly, with the person who says something about another taking it to that other person, rather than to spew their rhetoric behind their back, trying to convince others to go along with them.
From what I've seen and been told, this group uses private forums and conference calls to engage in gossip and rumor-mongering about other people, which is exactly what perps do. They seek to divide the TI community against itself by causing infighting and spreading hearsay and lies with no supporting evidence to back them up. At the same time, they recruit into their group those people with the worst characters and wackiest claims about targeting, which can only be intended to give the TI community a 'wackjob' reputation to the rest of the world. They attract these people because these people are incredibly gullible, or they're such little insecure wimps in real life that being a part of this group makes them feel big, picking on others for the merest things.
This group originated with OSI Informers, who has since changed his pseudonym to 'Will Litigate', but who is really Greg Gamache. I believe he is now also using the name 'Tim Lavenger' as well. He works with a large number of others on facebook, including members of FFCHS like Dee Hardin, Linda Johnson, Marika Banderas, and Ken Wilbourne Jr., so I assume that FFCHS is still in much league with them. This would make sense, since FFCHS apparently is only there to identify people (TIs or not) who might be turned into perps, or who are real TIs and who get perped further by this group and possibly others like it once they're identified. When I say that FFCHS is a cult, this group makes up it's private online army and is filled with its most loyal mind-controlled members.
REAL targeted individuals know the tactics that perps use, and these ARE perp tactics that this group plays on others. Not once have any of the people associated with this group EVER produced hard evidence to back up any of their allegations against others. Instead, they try to convince others by repeating hearsay, twisting facts, or creating outright lies.
They cry and snivel about being called perps while calling others perps in the very same breath. Major hypocrites...
NO REAL TI would engage in organized online stalking and character assassination to the degree and with the obsessiveness that this group has done for at least the past three years.
In fact, like with FFCHS, I have no idea WHAT GOOD this group thinks it's doing for the TI community, engaging in these activities. They set a terrible example for other TIs to follow. Most of them use fake names and switch accounts like they switch underwear when the older ones get too many shit stains on them. They often put satanic symbolism in their pics, which reflects which way they lean. They act like immature little children, and I think many of them are truly mentally deranged and are in desperate need of psychiatric help.
Let me know if you have encounters with these people. I'm taking names and I'm gonna kick some ass...
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
I'm so sorry that Robin Williams is gone. I'm even sorrier that he had to suffer with his demons, like so many others Hollywood stars have had to and still do and will continue to in the future.
This reminds me of what I only recently learned about Jim Morrison, one of my all-time favorite musical performers, who was very likely subjected to MKULTRA-style mind-control as a child. His father was a very important military leader, although most people still don't know this. He was Admiral George Stephen Morrison, commander of the US Naval fleet in the Gulf of Tonkin at the start of the Vietnam War. He was not a good man because he knowingly involved himself in the false flag operation that started that war. Jim had disowned his family, and he particularly despised his father. He had a brother and a sister as well. He always refused to talk about his family. The only reference he apparently ever made to them was in the song The End, where he fantasized about acting out his pent up rage...
"He went into the room where his sister lived and... then he... paid a visit to his brother and then he... He walked on down the hall. And he came to a door... And he looked inside. 'Father?' 'Yes, son?' 'I want to kill you.' 'Mother? I want to... raaaaaaape you!!!'"
That was how he dealt with his demons, through his music. You can hear it when you listen to that particular song. He externalized his deep-seated anger and frustration, and where else could it have come from? When he wasn't performing, he was a very mellow guy. When he got on stage, it was like he was possessed of another mind, one that had been through something awful in his childhood.
Yes, Jim Morrison and Robin Williams and many other stars who are now gone had demons, but these aren't possessions of spirits, they're induced by purposely fractured minds. The same probably goes for so many other stars.
Like Jim, many of the rising stars in the early rock music industry were also from military families, and they all seemed to just 'coincidentally' find themselves together in the Los Angeles/San Francisco area at the same time in the mid-1960s just before they all became very successful. That's a whole other story, but the fact is, their talents appear to have developed 'spontaneously', and they were certainly exceptional talents, as was that of Robin Williams.
This is what mind-control has often been used for within secret military and government programs - to enhance a person's talents and abilities. Even just through the use of hypnosis, a person's mind can be fractured into multiple personalities, and some of these personalities can appear to be demons. They can interfere with the original personality by appearing as voices in their head. They can switch in based on a specific trigger, such as being on stage. Jim Morrison was known to suddenly change personalities and go into a sort of trance as soon as he hit the stage. You can see a lot of other performers do this too. They call it 'getting into character', but it's more than just that. They had to learn the character first. I'm sure that Robin Williams and many other stars are/were very much the same.
Hollywood is one of the main satanic centers of America, and always has been. The reason why so many stars make it in Hollywood is because they 'sell their souls' without necessarily realizing it. Usually this occurs when they are still quite young and not aware of what they're getting involved in. They are introduced to techniques like NLP and hypnosis to enhance their talents. They are given a taste of 'the good life' where every luxury and pleasure is easily provided, while being constantly encouraged by agents and producers and other stars who have already 'made it' that being rich and famous is a worthy pursuit and within their reach. They become mesmerized by it all. Before they know it, it's too late and written contracts tie them to the slavery of that world.
Jim Morrison landed a five year contract with one of these agents, with an agreement to produce seven albums in that time. He desperately wanted out before the five years were up, but he stuck to his contract and produced those seven albums, and then quickly got out. But still it was too late. He was murdered. He had been used and discarded. With the secret of his family background, he knew too much...
Zionist Jews own and run the entertainment industry (like they own and run the media and everything else that we allow to govern our lives today) and their doctrines describe the use of mind-control. They are the original satanists. They invented the idea of Satan and demons. These ideas stem directly from their doctrines, but they are actually alter-personalities created through mind-control. Zionists have been behind every major religion, and have planted this idea in each one to cover the real source of these 'demons'. These religions used to be very effective control systems, but now the media industry (news and entertainment) is their main control system. The media has always has been used to condition and control the masses. The media is a mind-control system. Look how attached everyone is to these stars, and how we feed their inner 'demons' by looking to them for entertainment. WE ARE JUST AS GUILTY of taking part in the slow or sudden destruction of these people.
Monday, March 24, 2014
x-store-info:J++/JTCzmObr++wNraA4Pa4f5Xd6uensydyekesGC2M= Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=none (sender IP is 18.104.22.168) firstname.lastname@example.org; dkim=none header.d=applestore.com; x-hmca=none email@example.com X-SID-PRA: firstname.lastname@example.org X-AUTH-Result: NONE X-SID-Result: NONE X-Message-Status: n:n X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MTtHRD0xO1NDTD0w X-Message-Info: NhFq/7gR1vTXhm8qeK2K5cMGgcxJU15jOm/pz3kHHa2cZu39/8f/cmkojhBUue+JvYxM/6M8MkDW6k57Jn1pphEuPE01cIBr7urntiHVzfaeZVaYq2lK2EAQmKjOfueUgBQG+cgROkPxrCpCtJapGp3Xuyh5l7J+W/4PoZTy6UAZR32meJ+onJR11LXtyPCdJOGilzrysIPcWxI7BrBlF8TkQjrTfF6R Received: from smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net ([22.214.171.124]) by SNT0-MC4-F46.Snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4900); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 07:52:51 -0700 Received: from [126.96.36.199] (helo=smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <email@example.com>) id 1WS6F8-0004sz-E8 for firstname.lastname@example.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:52:50 +0100 Received: from 53553044.cm-6-6a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([188.8.131.52] helo=GP1) by smtp6.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <email@example.com>) id 1WS6EL-0005df-EB for firstname.lastname@example.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:52:01 +0100 From: "Canada Revenue" <email@example.com> Subject: Message sent to firstname.lastname@example.org To: email@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="35OH22GMtR7STT=_PRNl1b9uzdre0yL6BB0" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:51:14 -0400 X-Ziggo-spambar: --- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -3.2 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,CHW1252=0.01,DYN_RDNS_SHORT_HELO_HTML=0.001,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1=0.001,HELO_NO_DOMAIN=1.194,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_MID=0.497,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Return-Path: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-ID: <SNT0-MC4-F46lrIcKh8006d3c98@SNT0-MC4-F46.Snt0.hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2014 14:52:51.0295 (UTC) FILETIME=[BACD26F0:01CF4770] This is a multi-part message in MIME format --35OH22GMtR7STT=_PRNl1b9uzdre0yL6BB0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - New Page 1 Dear Taxpayer, After the last annual calculation of your fiscal activity we have dete= rmined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of : $521.51 Regarding this, please complete the Refund Form and mail it to one of = the addresses from the second page. >> Your *Refund Reference Number is: Ref/12213/2013 << *Refund Amount : 521.51 $. To access the form for your tax refund, please Click Here NOTE! For security reasons, remove the form from your computer after printing. Thank you, Canada Revenue Agency --35OH22GMtR7STT=_PRNl1b9uzdre0yL6BB0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>New Page 1</TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindow= s-1252"></HEAD> <BODY> <P>Dear Taxpayer,</P> <P>After the last annual calculation of your fiscal activity we have d= etermined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of : $521.51<B= R>Regarding this, please complete the Refund Form and mail it to one o= f the addresses from the second page.<BR>>> Your *Refund Referen= ce Number is: Ref/12213/2013 <<<BR>*Refund Amount : 521.51 $.</P> <P>To access the form for your tax refund, please <A href=3D"http://ho= nest007.com/webcalendar/includes/tools/index.php">Click Here</A></P> <P>NOTE!<BR>For security reasons, remove the form from your computer a= fter printing.</P> <P>Thank you,<BR>Canada Revenue Agency</P></BODY></HTML> --35OH22GMtR7STT=_PRNl1b9uzdre0yL6BB0--
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
If you were a government and you wanted to hide your true capabilities from your enemies, would you want them to underestimate those capabilities, or to overestimate them?
Most people will probably think that it would be best to lead your enemies to underestimate your capabilities, since you would then have more than what they expected.
But let's consider what situation would result if instead you led your enemies to overestimate your capabilities. For instance, if you put out 'leaked' reports that you had made technological advances in areas of science that were not already well developed or known about, it would lead your enemies to take steps to begin their own research and development in that area just to keep up, thereby wasting their efforts. At the same time, they would have a false impression of what to expect in the case of a potential attack, so that they would also waste efforts in taking steps to defend against it.
By leading your enemies to overestimate your capabilities, a definite advantage is created, where you will know exactly what you really have as well as what your enemies think you have, while your enemies will never be certain of what you might really have laying at the ready, and must assume that what they've been led to believe is true, even if they never see any evidence of it beyond hints and rumors.
On the other hand, if you were to lead your enemies to underestimate your capabilities, the moment you reveal your true capabilities by actually using them, you no longer have that advantage of uncertainty, and you must now worry about your enemies acquiring those same capabilities. You can keep your secret capabilities out of use so that your enemies don't ever discover them, but then there's no point in having them.
So, leading your enemies to overestimate your capabilities is far more advantageous, and this is done through the release of disinformation.
There is one other possible situation that should be considered here. If you have or are developing capabilities that would give you the advantage and thereby lead your enemies to underestimating you, and you want to lead them to overestimate you instead, you can create decoys that will lead them to think the capabilities are something other than what they really are. This situation can be dealt with in a manner that is explained further on in this article, where cover stories are discussed. In this case, the cover stories (are parts of them) are intentionally 'leaked', in order to lead your enemies into false perceptions so that they will take steps that will be wasted.
Let's consider another aspect of all this. What sort of disinformation would be better - that which sounds plausible, or that which sounds implausible?
Most people might think that the more implausible a piece of information is, the less likely it would be considered. However, in the world of secrecy and espionage, nothing is necessarily as it appears, and truths can be hidden in implausible stories as much as they might be found in plausible ones. But, just as we saw in the case of overestimations versus underestimations, creating a level of uncertainty would be in your favor, since an implausible story, although it might signify to the enemy that it's disinformation and will therefore contain hidden truths, investigating it will nevertheless waste a great deal of their time and efforts as they attempt to uncover those hidden truths.
Some real-life examples of this third situation include: using the UFO/alien abduction scenario to cover up mind-control research and technologies; using the events surrounding the purported Philadelphia Experiment to cover up the research into antigravity and stealth technologies*; and using the current exaggerated misconceptions about mind-control technologies to cover up more plausible ones.
Disinformation is usually created preemptively, meaning that a cover story is formulated before an idea for research and development into a prospective technological advancement even gets put down on paper. This occurs at the point when only a minimal number of people know anything about the idea, and it's at this point that cover stories are created that will satisfy the needs of anyone who will be brought in to handle the various aspects of the research and development.
Compartmentalization of information will also be incorporated at the very outset, and different cover stories can be given to the different people working separately on the different components of the overall project, and none of them will ever know that what they are working on might be related to anyone else's work, nor will any of them know what the overall project goal is. As each stage of the R&D is fulfilled, the next stages go through this same procedure, with cover stories being formulated preemptively and new people being brought in to work separately on each of the various components of that stage. Should any information leaks occur, only the cover stories will ever be revealed, since the real goals will remain tightly held by the few people who are in charge of the overall project.
Now, let's consider how this works with respect to someone who is brought in to work on some aspect of a classified project. They can be given a cover story and know that it's false, and this is fine as long as it doesn't hinder their ability to do their work. They're just there to do their job, and they know that the cover story is for their protection as much as it is to protect the security of the project. They accept the cover story and don't ask questions or speculate too much on what the real truth might be, because they know that they could be targeted by the enemy to gain information. This might be accomplished through a variety of social engineering techniques that could be unsuspectingly used on them in an attempt to draw out useful pieces of information, or it might take the form of more drastic methods that could involve their abduction and torture. So, for their own safety as much as for the safety of the project, they work under the pretense of a cover story and don't even speculate on what the truth might be.
Before they're even brought into the project, these people will have undergone extensive security checks, and as soon as they're brought in but before they're told anything about the project, they will be made to sign a security oath that carries extreme penalties if they breach it. Also, throughout the project and possibly for many years after (depending on what they know), they will be closely monitored to assure that the security is maintained.
Because the people working on a classified project can know that the cover story they're given is false, it's implausibility doesn't really matter, as long as it serves to explain the purpose of their work.
In the case where purposeful leaks are desired to throw off your enemies, certain people who are brought into a project can be selected because of their lack of ability to maintain certain levels of security, in which case they will only be given carefully selected information, cover stories, or weak security measures that will lead to possible 'leaks' of disinformation that appears to be valid. In these situations, these people will usually be selected because they're susceptible to believing that the cover story they're given is the truth.
_ _ _
* See Nick Cook's 'The Hunt for Zero Point: Inside the Classified World of Antigravity Technology' for an in depth look at how this implausible disinformation story was used to cover up more plausible R&D, which has effectively led to a gross overestimation (and misconception) of the US government's technological capabilities that continues today.
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
I woke up this morning thinking about Sandy Hook, and I had a thought that has crossed my mind many times before. All of this media technology that we've so quickly accepted as a good thing has intentionally been used to introduce the rest of the world to us in the privacy (?) of our homes through newspapers, radio, television, and then the internet, but prior to their introduction we didn't concern ourselves very much at all with events that were going on with people we don't know halfway around the world. Local events and people we knew personally were all that mattered. Eliminate the media, or at least localize it, and the perceived problems that we worry about virtually disappear.
Because of this fact, it's actually quite unnatural to concern ourselves too much about children or anyone else who may or may not have been killed in a purported travesty that we would otherwise never hear about and would therefore have no effect on us at all. Millions of people die every single day, by every means imaginable, whether they might be babies or senior citizens, innocents or not-so-innocents, important figures or nobodies, through violence, accidents, or natural causes. That's just a fact of life.
Just ask yourself these questions: How often do you hear about the deaths or travesties of people in your own community? How many of them do you really even know? Who in your community that die, or have crimes committed against them, do you never hear about? Why is who they are and their personal misfortune considered so much less important than those you DO hear about? What causes you to concern yourself with events that go on in communities that have absolutely no association to you? Who or what goads you to concern yourself?
YES, I care about young children, no matter who they are or where they live. I just naturally love them and feel for them. I also care about the threats that lie outside my community that may eventually affect me here at home. However, this fact of human nature (caring) can be abused as much as any other, for purposes that we don't always know or understand, and because of our media technologies more than anything else it CAN and IS being abused to influence us to think and act outside of our natural human state, overlooking our own local world and engrossing ourselves in matters that take place elsewhere.
But of course, what I've just said was merely prompted from a hazy thought that I had while still waking up, so let's move on to matters that we might think are less sleep-induced...
By all appearances, to those who are awake, the Sandy Hook 'shooting' was a fake news event at a fake school involving fake evidence and fake victims who were presented with their fake families in fake photos to present a fake scenario of fake violence perpetrated by a fake suspect whose suicidal death was faked in order to fake the fact that fake guns and fake pharmaceuticals played a fake part in a fake crime that was reported to us by fake reporters giving fake news stories to fake the facts about fake crimes that give them a fake reason to continue to offer fake news.
What is even real any more?
Why do we allow ourselves to be emotionally influenced by all this, and allow it to act on our imaginations to create the perception of a larger world that only makes us fear each other here at home as much as anywhere?
Who is affected by this the most - those who are still sleeping, or those who are waking up and paying attention?
While we study these fake stories and attempt to make sense of the many inconsistencies and constant changes in the 'official' stories, we often forget that these inconsistencies are very often purposefully intended to keep us busy chasing false leads. This just shows that we're still not fully awake.
As an example of purposeful misdirection, very early on when the Sandy Hook story hit the news on December 14, 2012, a law enforcement official (or someone claiming to be one), speaking under conditions of anonymity, told the Associated Press that the shooter was Ryan Lanza, that Adam Lanza was being held in New Jersey for questioning, and that their mother worked at the school as a teacher. According to the original story be the Associated Press, "The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the source was not authorized to speak on the record about the developing criminal investigation."
So we should ask ourselves, apart from many other questions that this media event raises, WHY was this person speaking at all, if not to obfuscate the facts and send 'conspiracy theorists' chasing false leads?
Looking back in retrospect, we can see the amount of confusion information like this tends to create, making it virtually impossible to bring everybody who's following the story up to speed and thereby dividing them in their beliefs and understandings and causing a lot of infighting that just slows down discovery of the truth.
Little things that get passed off early on as inconsequential matters (such as the fact that this information was given anonymously) are later forgotten or not even recognized, while the tainted information continues to be accepted as fact and mulled over for a long time afterwards. In this particular case, as well as many others, the paper trail back to the original source of information disappears, making it almost impossible to unwind the story and review it in a new light of clearer wakefulness.
These news events pass through our minds like we're in a dream and we don't take much notice of the little details that would reveal that it's just a dream.
Only rarely does anyone bother to archive information about events like Sandy Hook at the moment that they first get it, so that it can be reanalyzed later on if required. We can't rely on a complicit media or anyone else to preserve such key pieces of evidence for us, as with the case here (the Associated Press later removed the article that contained this information from an 'anonymous law enforcement official'). Only by preserving the details we come across that make up the full 'dream sequence' can we later wake ourselves up from the illusions and recognize what is real and what is not.
But maybe it's all just so tiring to do so, and falling back asleep is easier. I don't know...
Thursday, February 13, 2014
(These facebook conversations are from 2013. I’m reposting them to save myself the trouble of having to repeat myself and explain my position when my character and motives are attacked. My responses are in blue.)
3:58am Feb 15
To Anthony - this is the biggest problem for victims, division, compartmentalization (sorry, have no idea how to spell that). We need one unifying idea we can all agree upon and I see there is urgent need to take "conspiracy flair" from TI, Mk, rfid, etc. issues, we have to legalize them and make communities admit it as a fact that is necessary to be investigated - legally, technically, biologically, medically, socially and psychologically. We need trustworthiness in the issue, science, etc. And each of us needs information from one source, maybe some already existing organization or group?
There is a major problem with relying on one source for information, Duck Hunt. A single source of information gives that source the ability to control the group and what it believes. It can easily lead to cultism, which I see taking place with certain people who act as ‘spokespeople’ for many TIs. When many people rely on a single source (or a few sources who work together and effectively support each other), and begin to put more and more trust and reliance on it, ‘groupthink’ is the result. When this happens, you have a problem where the weight of common belief among the group tends to cause critical thinking to be avoided, and the introduction of alternative ideas come to be seen by the group as an aberration on the harmony of the group, who all follow the same belief. Critical thinking and alternative ideas NEED to be introduced to assure that groupthink doesn’t occur and people don’t get led astray with false information. In TI groups especially, where many of the facts behind the issues aren’t at all certain and people are already weakened by their situations, someone acting as a single source of information has incredible power to take advantage of the group and draw it away from ideas and information that they might not want people to consider. The intel agencies that are essentially responsible for all this targeting know this very well, and can and will create spokespeople who have the ability to develop a strong following. Even apart from the influence of intel agencies, spokespeople can take advantage of the situation and start milking the group for money or personal power. I see it happening regularly. This is exactly how cults develop. I see signs of this in these groups as well.
5:19pm Feb 15
Anthony, I would like to inform you , that if you want't those specifics, feel free to reach NSA in the USA ! I am sure they will be glad to provide you with all the information you are seeking . Or you may hire yourself an expert in these weapons and devices ! Magnus, Lars, or Jesee , do not owe you specifically any information disclosure . Simple as that . Additionally , as lawyer's say , " you would like others' the above mentioned TIs' to serve you information you are seeking on a silver platter with gold trim " ! And that , isn't going to happen to you . If you want something , nothing is for nothing .You want something , you have to work for it ! Meaning, go, seek what you are looking for on your own !
No, it’s not as simple as that, for the sake of being honest with all the TIs who might fall for these spokespeople’s claims.
Scientific explanations for the technology that Magnus Olsson (or anyone else) claims to exist don’t require contacting the NSA. Scientific facts are verifiable through other sources. Making legitimate claims about the technology requires knowing it well enough to describe how it works in scientific terms. That’s what anybody should expect. The point is, Ollson and these others you mention act like they’re so certain of themselves that they go around promoting their claims as fact when it should be DEMANDED that they have ascertained that there are no other explanations for the experiences that TIs are having, otherwise they’re nothing more than con artists and snake-oil salesmen. It’s as simple as THAT.
And why are you so willing to support them, anyway? What’s in this for you, Marika Bandera? Since you so quickly call me a perp for rightfully questioning the claims of Olsson without having any apparent reason to believe them yourself, why are you and certain others acting as his front-line defense? It could be that YOU are a perp, helping in a psyop program. I’ve already done the research to prove scientifically that these implant technologies have to be other than what is being claimed by so many snake-oil salesmen that come and go and damage the clarity of mind regarding the facts that TIs need to have to get help for their situation. Without those facts, there’s never going to be any way to prove beyond any reasonable doubt to a court or other government body that the experiences TIs are having are legitimate. I don’t doubt that TIs experiences ARE real, but not what people like Olsson, Beltran, and many others who have come and gone claim they are. This will only make TIs look delusional without them having those facts to present when the time comes to face the authorities with them. So, until then, what’s the point of Olsson going around giving lectures to more and more TIs to draw them into his following, instead of collecting the necessary facts that will prove this in a court of law, which he and Beltran and others SHOULD be doing if they really want to help them?
If you don’t get it, and you really have nothing to gain by supporting him by arguing with TIs like me who want evidence that will actually hold up in court, I advice you to back the fuck off NOW.
Marika Bandera commented on Hunam Sanctem's post in Targeted Individuals International.
6:09am Feb 15
I do not believe that I have to back up anything about Magnus legitimacy to you or anyone here , really . Those of us who know him , we know him that's good enough for us how , or what we know about his crudential , or work. Besides, Magnus is busy giving lectures and seminars in Europe about the technologies and weapons being used on individuals wide spread in Europe and North America . That's more than most of us all together have ever done so far here on this side of the globe. Lars in Europe is also very active and engaged giving seminars like Magnus! If you want to know more, feel free to ask another great activist here in america Jesse Beltran who made the effort to meet personally both Magnus and Lars, as well many other European TI's ! Jesse was also interviewed on " White TV- channel ", in Sweden together with others. All 3 of the above gentleman work in co-ordinated fashion to inform the general public about TI happenings ! It's regretful if anyone here lacks to follow these 3 great guys activist work . Since all 3 of them forward to the rest of us updates of their ongoing activities in from of websites, and or videos ! If I may add , I most certainly do not know neither one of your's credential if you guys' here are even legitimate TI to start with , but I don't pick bones with you about it! If I may suggest, instead of ranting here , perhaps you guys may want to consider take a more active role and be a true activists. You can get in touch with Jesse, should you need any tips, on how to ! Hope i have answered your questions satisfactory !
Marika Bandera gives a very good example of what I warn about with these spokespeople who act as supposed ‘informed parties’ and start to seek a following that can lead to a cult following (and seems to be, in Magnus’ and Jesse’s case). Do you not already see how his ardent believers have developed groupthink and close themselves off to alternative opinions? This is why it’s extremely crucial that Magnus provide the technical information that would support his claims. This is also why it’s important that he doesn’t close himself off to questions from outsiders who haven’t bought into his belief system. She says that he’s busy talking elsewhere about the tech, but that doesn’t qualify as a reason to avoid the hard questions. I have looked at some of his information, and find it very weak on facts. It’s far easier for him to keep looking for new audiences and introducing his ideas to them than to face those left behind who have since looked further into what he says and discerned the faults within it. He, and others like him, always expect the questioners to follow a paper trail of useless information that they refer to as ‘evidence’. He should be focused on facts, not his own subjective interpretation of his or other’s experiences based on mere assumptions drawn from a few facts that don’t really add up to what he claims.
Jesse Beltran is another person I would like to talk to and ask some serious questions.
That these people work together is extremely suspicious as well. That any of them are too busy giving lectures, or that they have been on TV, is completely irrelevant. That just shows that they’re interested in popularity and/or money. I’ve been asked on a number of occasions to go to TI conferences and speak (even offered money to do so), and I immediately refused. I’m NOT going to go that route and get caught up in the glory or even possible manipulation as a psyop dupe, as I think these people are. TIs around the world can already access what I have to say through my published work. What’s the point of wasting my time like these others do going around repeating myself over and over when my energies are better spent doing more research to find out more facts and eliminate the myths and fallacies?
I wonder, Marika Bandera, what do these ‘updates’ actually consist of? What valuable new information could these spokespeople possibly be getting when they’re so busy giving lectures and scanning for implants?
BTW, my credentials are shown in the quality of my published work. Have you ever seen the diplomas that Olsson should have from his schooling in economics (which is another word for marketing)? Or do you just accept that he’s telling the truth and then buy into everything else he tells you?
‘Picking bones’, as you call it, is important. As for taking an active role, Marika Bandera, you just need to look at my work so far. I put ALL my time into this, all day, every day, for years now. If anything, I deserve a pat on the back, not your ignorant slights and accusations.
Here are some links to some of my work that you can start with, if you have the wherewithal to consider it…
This next one is the ONLY one I ask money for, and only a very small amount…
Marika Bandera commented on Hunam Sanctem's post in Targeted Individuals International.
6:40am Feb 15
Thank you Michael . As anyone who knows me by now I don't beat around the bush and most certainly don't go around picking on any TI or pretend to be more smarter or important than any other person here ! After all, we are all of us here in this predicament together ! No one is lesser or better ! Mutual respect for TIs' is my policy .
Liar. You just picked on me and Hunam Sanctem for daring to think critically about the claims of Olsson. Just because we’re all facing similar problems doesn’t entitle you to try to knock someone’s intelligence down to your level so you feel more of an equal. It’s up to you to smarten up, in every sense of that term. Nobody here is claiming to be smarter or more important than everyone else. Sorry for you that you see it that way and can’t deal with it. That’s how lazy fools excuse themselves from having to actually think or be useful members of society. I’m NOT going to kiss anybody’s ass and descend to their level of thinking just to fit in and be liked. This issue is FAR too important for that sort of social behavior. TIs who want support should be willing to learn, as much as anything, and how I support TIs is to educate them. If you don’t want that, go hang out somewhere else, or avoid whatever threads I’m in. It’s as simple as that.
FEB. 12/2014 NOTE: After posting a link to my latest blog entry in the group POLICE - MILITARY - MIND CONTROL on facebook, I was immediately kicked out by the moderator, Denis O’Sullivan, and then Marika Bandera began attacking me online in other groups and completely misrepresenting what I had said in that blog as well as my character. I believe, from looking at the members of that group and recognizing many of the names from past experiences with them, that that group is a cult group. Beware!
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
There is an axiom used in science that relates to this problem, which is that "the map is not the territory". What this means is that a map or model can never be as detailed as the thing it represents. That being the case, consider what would be entailed in mapping a person's entire brain. With 100 billion individual neurons, each having as many as ten thousand connections to other neurons, and each connection being able to express at least two states (i.e. on or off), it would require 2,000,000,000,000,000 (2 quadrillion) bits of data space on a computer to record all brain activity for a single moment of time.
But of course, this wouldn't do for any sort of mind-reading technology, because brain activity takes time before anything meaningful can be made of it. Neurons take as little as a millisecond (1/1000 of a second) to fire, so for an accurate reading we would want to be sure to take at least a thousand readings per second. And even one second won't reveal much, so for all practical purposes, let's say one hour is the minimum time allotment for reading one person's brain activity. There are 3,600 seconds in an hour, so we need 3,600,000 times more data space, or:
2,000,000,000,000,000 (neural connections)
x 3,600,000 (milliseconds per hour)
= 7,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 bits of data space for one hour for one person.
That's nearly 900,000 petabytes! (A petabyte is 1 million gigabytes.) This is comparable to the amount of data that gets transmitted over the internet in the equivalent amount of time. As you can imagine, this wouldn't be very practical at all, even if it were possible. This only accounts for the data space needed for storing the information, which says nothing about the active memory space that would be needed to work with it. It doesn't take into account long-term storage requirements for dictionaries of all the various signature frequency patterns and their meanings. It also doesn't take into account how this information would be interfaced by a human user. And remember, every person's brain is different, so each person would require a separate map and dictionary of signature patterns.
This should help to put things into proper perspective. As you can see, mapping the human brain at this level of precision is completely impractical in terms of data storage requirements, and after taking into account all the various problems I've explained elsewhere regarding remotely reading the brain's electromagnetic activity, this goes beyond just being impractical and becomes impossible.
There are other ways than brain mapping and remote electromagnetic influencing that are far easier to accomplish and less resource intensive to force a person to act, feel, or think outside of their own control. I've been researching this and the implementation is quite simple, really. It's based on hypnosis. With V2K technology, a hypnotic tone can be used to put a person into the appropriate state for hypnotic induction, after which the hypnotic suggestions/commands are inserted. Another method is to use the appropriate electromagnetic frequency (somewhere around 11 Hz) to induce the appropriate hypnotic state, which can be done even while the person is sleeping.
With V2K, subliminal audio messages can be directly inserted into the subconscious without the awake person being aware of it. If the person is being targeted while asleep, the messages don't necessarily have to be subliminal, but it would probably be safer for the attacker that they were.
Hypnosis allows suggestions or commands to be inserted that will be acted on later, when the person is no longer in a hypnotic state. The commands can be quite crafty, in that they can defeat any conscious attempts to override them or to even accept the possibility that the person has been hypnotized, thereby securing against discovery.
Hypnosis has also been shown to cause a telepathic connection between the hypnotist and the hypnotized subject, so that once it's established, suggestions can be given in this way. Another fact about hypnosis is that the more often the subject is hypnotized by the hypnotist, the easier the subject responds to him, and therefore the better the telepathic connection becomes.
Saturday, February 8, 2014
In The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and Ancient Texts, author Joseph P. Farrell donates a chapter to the subject of giants. In it, he offers some strong evidence that they actually lived on our planet at one time.
The first piece of evidence that Farrell points to is a certain treatise entitled Concerning the Long Life of Men Before the Flood, and the Greater Size of Their Bodies, which was written by no less than St. Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430 AD). In this treatise, St. Augustine attests to having personally seen, on the shore of Utica, the skeletal remains of giant men. He describes the molar tooth of one such giant as being one hundred times the size of a normal human molar. These could not have been mistakenly identified dinosaur bones, since there were a number of them to judge by, and it would be hard to misidentify the skull that the molar came from as anything but that of a hominid. St. Augustine also wrote that such remains often became “laid bare by age or the force of rivers and various accidents”, which indicates that these graves may not have been so old as to have become completely fossilized in hard rock strata, but were instead embedded in earth that was still soft enough that natural erosion could easily expose them. This would suggest that these giants lived not so far in the past with respect to St. Augustine himself.
Another piece of evidence that Farrell offers comes from another very reliable source: the Roman historian, Pliny the Elder (23 – 79 AD). Pliny is said to have reported that the Romans had observed a living giant whose bones were later brought from Joppa in Judea by Marcus Scaurus. The skeleton was described as being over forty feet long, with a spine that was one and a half feet thick. If such a report was true (and there’s no reason to doubt that it was), then this means that such large giants had lived during Roman times.
To clarify this, Farrell informs us that the great explorers Vespucci, De Soto, Drake, Magellan, and Coronado all had encounters with living giants in the Americas, although they were not of such a degree in size as that which Pliny had reported. Still, these giants living in the Americas were variously reported as anywhere from nine to twelve feet tall. We should also note the connections that have already been made between South American cultures and the survivors of a deluge, which, as we have already seen, the biblical giants survived. It’s not unimaginable that some of these giants may have ventured to new lands after this event. In fact, Patagonia, Chile, is known as a former land of giants. This is where Magellan came across them in 1520, as did Sir Francis Drake fifty-eight years later. Several skeletons, over ten feet long, were discovered here in 1615 by crewmen from the Dutch schooner, Wilhelm Schouten.
Farrell also points to other evidence that exists in the form of archeological remains, and lists a number of findings that have been made of giant human skeletons of varying proportions, but none so extreme as that described by Pliny the Elder and St. Augustine.
In his book, Farrell also provides an interesting photograph taken in London, England in the nineteenth century, that shows one such mummified giant standing in a large coffin that rests upright against the back of a railroad car. The giant is said to stand twelve feet, two inches tall, and, as can be clearly seen in the photograph, its head easily overlooks the top of the railroad car. The picture of this giant was featured in the December issue of Strand magazine in 1895. This picture has also been reprinted in the August/September 2001 issue of Nexus magazine, along with the original article. The giant was discovered by a prospector in County Antrim, Ireland. The original article states that the right foot had six toes.
Much of Farrell’s information on giants comes from the earlier work of Stephen Quayle, who obviously goes into the subject in far greater detail in his own book, Genesis 6 Giants: Master Builders of Prehistoric and Ancient Civilizations.
In the mid to late 1800s, a large number of finds were made in certain areas of North America of giants who appear to have been of kingly status. These particular giants were all between seven and eight feet tall, and had each been buried under a large earthen mound, with care taken to encase the bodies in makeshift coffins made of stone slabs. Some had been adorned with crowns, copper bracelets, swords and armor, and some even buried with great treasures. In some instances there were indications of a written language. These people, and the mounds that were associated with them, the latter of which can be found in many areas of the United States, are believed to have lived in North America before the American Indians arrived, and were a distinct and separate race from them.
Another find was made in Lompock Rancho, California in 1833, when soldiers dug up the skeleton of a twelve foot tall man along with weapons and other artifacts that were carved with strange symbols. Amazingly, this giant was found to have a double row of teeth. This find was apparently reburied in an unknown location. Other giants with double sets of teeth, seven of them, have been found under mounds in Clearwater, Minnesota.
The Indianapolis News, Nov, 10, 1975, described a nine foot, eight inch skeleton that was excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana in 1879.
Seven skeletons of giants were found buried under a mound in Clearwater, Minnesota, in 1888. They had been placed in a sitting position, and each had double rows of teeth.
A huge stone sarcophagus was excavated in Crittenden, Arizona in 1891, containing the much-deteriorated remains of a twelve foot tall giant. Carvings on the granite coffin indicated that he had six toes.
In 1923, in the Grand Canyon, Arizona, a man by the name of Samuel Hubbard discovered two human skeletons that were fifteen and eighteen feet tall, respectively. Along with these, he also found a large number of footprints on an ancient beach, as much as twenty inches long, as well as that of a large elephant and a very small horse. He also found drawings that depicted elephants, ostriches, ibexes, dinosaurs, and a serpent with an egg in its mouth.
The Review-Miner, June 19, 1931, reported the discovery of two large human skeletons in the Humboldt lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. One was eight and a half feet tall, while the other was almost ten feet tall.
In 1932, at White Sands, New Mexico, human footprints were discovered in gypsum rock that measured twenty-two inches long and eight to ten inches wide.
Human footprints were found in solid rock in Braton, Tennessee, measuring thirty-three inches long and twelve inches wide, and having six toes.
Nine foot tall human skeletons, as well as the bones of what appeared to be tigers and dinosaurs, were found in Death Valley in 1947.
Another story is given by the author Ivan T. Sanderson, who relates that an engineer stationed on the Aleutian Islands during World War II uncovered a mound-type grave filled with the remains of giants. The craniums of these humans reportedly measured up to twenty-four inches from base to crown, where normally they should measure only about eight inches. These skulls were also trepanned, a practice that’s found among certain ancient cultures around the world (such as we saw with the Maya). These remains are apparently locked away at the Smithsonian Institute, being suppressed from public awareness.
Giant human skeletons have been found in Mexico as well. A New York Herald-Tribune article for June 21, 1925, and a Washington Post article for June 22, 1925, reported that miners had unearthed human skeletons measuring ten to twelve feet tall near Sisoguiche, Mexico. Also, in 1926, the bones of giants who averaged over ten feet in height were discovered at or near Nayarit, Mexico. And on October 2, 1927, the Los Angeles Times reported that gigantic human bones were found near Tapextla, Mexico.
The New York Times of February 14, 1936, reported that the headless skeleton of gigantic proportions was discovered in the Chontales district of Nicaragua, with ribs a yard long and four inches wide, and the shin bone too heavy for one man to carry.
The report of the skeleton of a thirteen foot tall giant, dressed in full armor with sword and battle-axe, found in Cumberland, England, was made in a book entitled History And Antiquities Of Allerdale, which stems from the Middle Ages. The teeth were six inches long and two inches wide.
The remains of exceptionally tall giants have been found in France from time to time. In 1456, a twenty-three foot tall human skeleton was found by a river in Valence, France. In 1577, the skeleton of a human, almost twenty feet tall, was unearthed from under an oak tree in the Canton of Lucerne, France. In 1613, a skeleton, more than twenty-five feet tall, was found near the castle of Chaumont, in France.
In the 1950s, in southeast Turkey, road workers came upon a number of tombs containing human giants. Several of the thigh bones measured over forty-seven inches long, and their deceased owners were estimated to have been from fourteen and sixteen feet tall.
Australia has also had its share of discoveries. These giants have been labeled ‘magenthropus’ by anthropologists, and were from seven to twelve feet tall. Many have been found near Bathurst, New South Wales. A human molar tooth was found in the area by naturalist Rex Gilroy, which measured 67 x 50 x 42 mm in size, coming from a giant that is estimated to have been twenty-five feet tall. A number of immense fossilized footprints have also been found, some of these measuring seven inches across the toes and about two feet in length. The largest of them is estimated to have come from a twenty foot tall human. These prints are dated to millions of years old. Footprints found in sandstone near Kempsey, N.S.W. by Noal Reeves were made by a giant who stood an estimated seventeen feet tall. The aborigines of Australia claim that giants inhabited the land before them.
In the Philippines, a human skeleton was reportedly found that measured seventeen feet tall.
In China, the remains of other giants have been found, labeled ‘gigantopithecus blacki’, after their discoverer. These giants are estimated to have been from ten to twelve feet tall.
In researching this subject, it appears that the remains of human giants have been found throughout the world, on all continents, dating back from millions of years ago right up to the very recent past.
The reduced height of giants in the more recent reports, such as those encountered in the Americas by early explorers, suggests that they had slowly lost their great stature over the generations. If we consider that in the Old Testament Bible, it’s shown that the original human race had life spans of almost one thousand years, and that these life spans gradually became shorter and shorter over the generations, then it is quite reasonable to speculate that the stature of these giants also decreased over the generations, and for similar reasons.